Archive for Film

Tell me it ain’t so

waterboarding - not really torture, just interrogation

waterboarding - not really torture, just 'interrogation'

Sitting at home, a cool cloth pressed against my fevered brow as I was laid up with a debilitating case of astigmatism. I could do little except for manipulate the controls for my multi-media centre – I was as weak as a kitten, enfeebled by agues and wracked by pain. It took all of my strength and determination to press ‘PLAY’ and collapse back onto my cushions hoping for some distraction from the malaise

But I had cued “W.” some weeks before and never got around to watching it – until now !

What was Oliver Stone thinking ?

This homage to the most recent ex-President of the United States of America depicts him as a half-witted privileged playboy who used his family connections to bail him out of difficult situations time and time again. He is portrayed as a drunk, a loud-mouth and slightly retarded (in my opinion) someone who seemed to think that he deserved every success but wasn’t willing to excert any effort whatsoever to achieve his ambitions. In short a spoiled pretentious rich-kid.

I’m not doubting that Josh Brolin did a good job, I liked his work in “No Country For Old Men”, he was OK in ‘Planet Terror’ and “The Valley Of Elah” and I’ve been a fan of Oliver Stone’s work for as long as I can remember. So I’m going to go out on a limb and say that it’s a bit too early to be making comment on Bush Jr’s presidency, that the harm and damage he inflicted on the US and the World is still taking place and so can’t be properly evaluated yet. It’s too much like the right-wing commentators who are saying that Obama is the worst president the US has ever seen

There are a few scenes in thsi film that stand out (apart from GW being pissed as a newt most of the time)  Bush and Cheney are having lunch in the Whitehouse, Cheney asks “if there was a 1% chance that the lettuce you are eating is contaminated with e-coli would you still eat it ?” Bush says that he would, there’s an army of food tasters in the kitchen  to make sure that he’s not poisoned, Cheney presses on trying to get Bush to understand that if there’s a one per-cent chance that there are WMD in Iraq they should proceed with a war Bush takes the lettuce off his sandwich, Cheney takes out a small folder Bush seems to balk at doing any reading but is reassured by Cheney that it’s ‘only 3 pages’. He explains that inside are some ideas regarding possible interrogation techniques that could be instituted at places such as Guantanamo (which George keeps calling Guantanamera ). W. balks at first, worried that there would be stuff like pulling out toenails, but Cheney assures him that it would be nothing lethal, just food/sleep deprivation – water torture – fear scenarios to make his point. W is reassured and promises to look at the three-page report. As lunch ends, W then asks Cheney to kindly keep his ego in check, he doesn’t mind the familiarity when they’re alone but when they’re in a meeting he’s got to remember he’s only the vice-president the only other person party to this discussion was the waiter who put the sandwiches on the table.

Oh and did I say that George was a big drinker ?

I ask because he wasn’t the brightest of the Bush Sr. progeny, he managed a ‘C’ average when you combine that with the Alcohol-Related-Brain-Damage that plagues heavy drinkers – it causes a loss of a few IQ points it may explain why he was so easily manipulated and drew so many wrong conclusions during his terms in office and why he seemed such a loon and a dim-wit.

I’m sure there are other projects going on about the Bush legacy, this was entertaining but I’d like to have heard a bit more on the inter-cabinet debates on the merits of torture, the necessity of waging war.

I shall have to watch this again when I am more recovered from this affliction and the pain has passed from my frail and weak body

about time, years ago

During the G.W Bush Presidency an Australian television network broadcast “The West Wing“.

I was quite a fan of this show, it allowed me to drift off and wonder what it would be like to have a Democrat as President instead of that churlish ne’er-do-well who had the reins of power at the time. It was a niche programme, appealing to those who

(a) had some interest in politics

and/or

(b) had some interest in US politics

That was always going to be hard for my local station to keep on the air. This was well-scripted, well-directed and well-acted – a fine example of what television could be. It also didn’t matter where one’s politics lay (on the left or  the other side). But for whatever reason they experimented with an 8.30pm start, changed the days it was broadcast, gave it ‘special’ viewing times, rested it for weeks on end then it just seemed to disappear, came back again and then it was finished. To this day I don’t know why or by whom Josh Lyman was shot

Anyway the series ended and an Hispanic guy was elected the new President, and whatever his name was (the actor not the character) went on to play a serial-killing psychopathic district attorney in “Dexter”.That was the last I ever heard of the production team and the writers until a pal said to me “have you had a crack at Studio 60 On The Sunset Strip ? – it was made by the people who made that TV show about the American president” he always used too many words that pal o’ mine I think it’s a confidence thing, where if you speak a lot the irrelevancies give you that little bit of time to think about what you actually want to say. Politicians do that a lot, maybe it has something to do with that ‘lot of hot air’ descriptive term that people often apply to pollie-speak. They either speak for too long (so they have time to think) or for too little (they are only interested in a 30 second  sound bite). I replied in the emphatic negative and he lent me a DVD,  I was caught up in this show as well.

Recently a guy asked me if he could borrow some TV recordings, he has a wife who is ill or something I gave him this show, but before I di I decided to revisit Episode 1 for it’s brilliant monologue which set the tone (and content) for the whole series.

To set the scene “Studio 60” is a comedy TV show broadcast on Saturday evening in front of a live audience from … well you can guess where from the title. Episode one opens with the Producer of the show in a heated argument with a network executive about some sketch which had some Christian connection. the network wants the sketch cut, the producer is arguing that free speech means that sometime people are offended, watch it, you might like it (if you work in television, as I do, then it will have further resonance that fine line between commercial realities (censorship) and artistic expression (freedom of speech))

He (the producer) relents and orders the segment be removed from the running list, while watching the broadcast from the wings what is replacing the cut sketch is un-funny, lame and offensive to him, he storms onto the set and orders the actors off. this is as much of that section of the script as I can find on the internet as a monologue wikipedia has a link to a script draft but watch it yourself the show transcends the page. If I have got any of  it wrong I apologise to Aaron Sorkin and Thomas Schlamme

Opening

Wes Mendell:

It’s not going to be a very good show tonight. *audience laughs*

I think you should change the channel, change the channel right now or better yet turn off the TV, ok?

No, no, I know it seems like this is supposed to be funny, but, uh, tomorrow, tomorrow you’re gonna find out that it wasn’t and by that time I’ll have been fired. *audience laughs*

No, this is not a sketch. This show used to be cutting edge political and social satire, but it’s gotten lobotomised by a candy ass broadcast network, hell-bent on doing absolutely nothing that might just challenge their audience.

We’re about to do a sketch that you’ve seen already about 500 times. Yeah, yeah, no one’s gonna confuse George Bush and George Plimpton,

now we get it.

We’re all being lobotomised by this country’s most influential industry. It’s just thrown in the towel on any endeavour to do anything that doesn’t include the courting of 12 year-old boys. Not even the smart 12 year-olds, the stupid ones, the idiots. Which there are plenty thanks in no small measure to this network. So why don’t you just, change the channel?

Turn off the TVs do it right now. (they cut to the control room, then back)

The struggle between art and commerce. Well, there’s always been a struggle between art and commerce and now I’m telling you art is getting it’s ass kicked and it’s making us mean and it’s making us bitchy.

It’s making us cheap punks.

That’s not who we are!

People are having contests to see how much they can be like Donald Trump. (cuts to the control room then back) We’re eating worms for money. “Who wants to screw my sister?” Guys are getting killed in a war that’s got theme music and a logo. That remote in your hand is a crack pipe. Oh yeah every once in a while we pretend to be appalled. (cuts to the control room then back)

(pause)

Pornographers! It’s not even good pornography. They’re just this side of snuff films, and friends that’s what’s next because that’s all that’s left. And the two things that make them scared gutless are the FCC and every psycho religious cult that gets positively horny at the very mention of a boycott. These are the people they’re afraid of. This prissy, feckless, off-the-charts, greed-filled, whorehouse of a network. And you’re watching this thoroughly unpatriotic mother-fu….

Sadly despite the fact that this was, too, quality TV it never had an airing here and was pulled in the US and replaced with the very type of television that Studio 60 railed against “The Real Wedding Crashers” It went on ‘holiday’ was promised to return to TV sets May 2007 but it appears to have not made that return October 2008 the official web-site for this fine programme was pulled.

If you read down towards the end of the Wikipedia entry for Studio 60 (it’s a link up above somewhere) you will notice

On July 19, 2007, the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences announced their nominations for the 2007 Primetime Emmy awards. Studio 60 was nominated in five categories. The pilot episode earned three nominations: Outstanding Directing (Thomas Schlamme), Outstanding Cinematography For A Single-camera Series, and Outstanding Casting in Dramatic Series. Both John Goodman and Eli Wallach were nominated Outstanding Guest actor in Dramatic Series. Even with some criticism, Studio 60 nominations surpassed critics’ darlings such as Friday Night Lights and Dexter, which got two and three respectively. The show also tied with hits like CSI and 24.

It looks like US TV is a medium that doesn’t appreciate the cameras being turned in on itself

I hope my friend’s wife gets better and I hope I get the disc back

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc1Ti-ehJ00&feature=related

Thar’s gold in them thar hills

I should add a film review column to this occasional publication.

I think I’d be good at it, well, as good as anyone else that does it.
I’m qualified- I’ve seen a few of them and can recognise a film when I see one, I have an internet connection so I can see what other people who have seen a particular film thought about it, I’m venal and corrupt so I can be bought by the studios.

What else does one need to know to be critic, probably not much.

Most films I’ve had offered to me by my local cinema are re-makes of one form or another
(The Eye, The Ring, The Day The Earth Stood Still, Valkyrie) are part of a franchise (any Bourne, Batman or Bond film) or have been developed from a video game (Max Payne or that one that was made with Angelina Jolie as some leather-clad kung-fu archaeologist). Of course the re-makes I’ve quoted are mostly films that were made in a different language and the English-language version is a poor cousin of the original (The Eye = Gin Gwai The Ring = Ringu It Day The Earth Stood Still = The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951) and Valkyrie = Stauffenberg but there’s probably a few more films about the plot to kill Adolph Hitler (If you’re into that sort of thing you might have a go at reading this fictional work around this subject “Making History” by Stephen Fry)

The movie studios have long stopped producing a film for any semblence of artistic merit, they’ve become even more conservative (if that is at all possible) if they’re not sure that it will make buckets of money then it’s never released to the public. I wonder if Quentin Tarantino would be able to film Pulp Fiction or Reservoir Dogs these days, somehow I don’t think that he would. And, man, has his last film left me with a taste of bitter vetch in my mouth (See, I’m a critic already !)

But if Tarantino wants to fly me to New York I’m willing to change my mind and write nothing but glowing reviews of anything he produces – I draw the line at bodily excretions, no I don’t but he should know that it will cost extra.

Any way we’ll see how it goes. I’m sure that there’s a buck to be made in it

Oh, and thanks IMDB I could never have made this without you !
http://www.imdb.com/